Belief Fusion and Revision: An Overview Based on Epistemic Logic Semantics
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, we formulate some approaches to belief fusion and revision using epistemic logic semantics. Fusion operators considered in this paper are majority merging, arbitration, and general merging. Some modalities corresponding to belief fusion and revision operators are incorporated into epistemic logics. The Kripke semantics of these extended logics are presented. While most existing approaches treat belief fusion and revision operators as meta-level constructs, we directly incorporate these operators into our object logic language. By doing so, we both extend the expressive power of epistemic logic and enhance the techniques of information fusion.
منابع مشابه
The Topological Theory of Belief
Stalnaker introduced a combined epistemic-doxastic logic that can formally express a strong concept of belief, a concept which captures the ‘epistemic possibility of knowledge’. In this paper we first provide the most general extensional semantics for this concept of ‘strong belief’, which validates the principles of Stalnaker’s epistemic-doxastic logic. We show that this general extensional se...
متن کاملBelief, Provability, and Logic Programs
The main goal of this paper is to establish a nonmonotonic epistemic logic EB with two modalities – provability and belief – capable of expressing and comparing a variety of known semantics for extended logic programs, and clarify their meaning. In particular we present here, for the first time, embeddings into epistemic logic of logic programs extended with a second kind of negation under the ...
متن کاملA Modal Logic for Reasoning about Possibilistic Belief Fusion
In this paper, we propose a modal logic for reasoning about possibilistic belief fusion. This is a combination of multiagent epistemic logic and possibilistic logic. We use graded epistemic operators to represent agents’ uncertain beliefs, and the operators are interpreted in accordance with possibilistic semantics. We employ ordered fusion based on a level skipping strategy to resolve the inco...
متن کاملar X iv : c s . A I / 02 01 02 0 v 1 23 J an 2 00 2 A Modal Logic Framework for Multi - agent Belief Fusion ∗
This paper is aimed at providing a uniform framework for reasoning about beliefs of multiple agents and their fusion. In the first part of the paper, we develop logics for reasoning about cautiously merged beliefs of agents with different degrees of reliability. The logics are obtained by combining the multi-agent epistemic logic and multi-sources reasoning systems. Every ordering for the relia...
متن کاملMeta-epistemic logic: A minimal logic for reasoning about revealed beliefs
Reasoning about knowledge described in classical propositional logic is usually handled either in the meta-language as in belief revision, considering the dynamics of belief bases, or at the object level by means of modal logic. In the latter case, modalities express knowledge, belief, or absence thereof, about the truth of formulae. But the semantics is described in terms of accessibility rela...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
دوره 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004